
I attended a small lunch last week with Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn. I have shared on this blog before
how much I admire Senator Alexander, and I'll say it again: he is one of my favorite senators. While he fights hard for Republican positions that he believes in, he is willing to listen and reason with those on the other side of the aisle.
I had a very interesting discussion with him about spending and where voters are at on that issue. He voiced what I have been sensing; spending is a hot-button issue and will be for months to come. This appropriations cycle is likely the high water mark for the next couple years.
I have been struck by the difference between the parties when it comes to expectations about a lame duck session following the elections. Democrats are now speculating that it will be a productive time with much legislation passed. Republicans, which are likely to pick up House and Senate seats, are now saying they may do as little as possible until reinforcements come in January. History tells us that little is generally accomplished during a lame duck session.
It has also been interesting to hear the latest private thoughts from several senators about the Tea Party. Democrats haven't quite figured out Tea Partiers. Republicans think they have, but aren't quite comfortable with them. Six of the Republican senators I visited with in the last week expect the Tea Party to roar through Congress and make a huge impact in 2010 and 2012 elections. Privately, the moderate Republicans I spoke with were befuddled by the Tea Party candidates. While they respect their energy, they don't see the Tea Party candidates as experienced or effective legislators in the future.
Both parties are interpreting the mood of much of the electorate as something similar to, "I don't know who my member of Congress is, but whoever it is, I'm against 'em." It does appear that no matter the party, the general mood is anti-incumbent.
Stay tuned. The next five months are going to be interesting.