I am struggling with the question of how do we deal with
the Obama Administration in regard to our programs. What do we say to the
Administration if their budget numbers are bad for Community Action? This is
really is a quandary for me. It is something I am wrestling with at the moment.
There are some very good people at the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) who are involved with our program. These are people I really like
and respect. How do I sit down with them and have a conversation about their
proposed initiatives which I believe are not good for our network? What do I
say when the Administration has basically said ours is a network they can do without?
I am not predicting with 100% accuracy that the
Administration’s budget request for 2013 will eliminate CSBG funding but
looking at their position and stance last year, there is not a lot of room for
optimism in my forecasting. Ahead of us is a much more competitive and
difficult funding environment.
I am really wrestling with what to say to the
Administration. After the State of the Union last year and after the Administration came out
with their budget last year, I was invited to go to meetings and to sit down
with HHS. I was conflicted about it last year and I am still really conflicted
about it. On the one hand, I view the
Administration as having a total lack of confidence in our programs. I view the
budget cuts as the end of the discussion. If that is the case, I need to
prepare to battle in Congress. On the other hand, I really like many of the
people working within HHS. I know they have been dealt a very difficult hand
and I am really torn about not working with them. I continue to debate my
response to their invitations but I am leaning heavily toward focusing on
Congress. I am not comfortable intellectually with my position within this
situation.
I know one of the issues that will be discussed in these
meetings is accreditation. I know another discussion topic will be performance.
These are controversial issues. HHS wants our network to make accommodations
and yet I see no contribution to the network on our behalf. To the contrary, I
understand their message to us is that Community Action is not an integral program
to the priorities of the Administration. That is a tough statement.
I have been thinking about the benefits and the purpose of my
participation in these meetings. I feel one purpose may be to gain my
agreement to introducing competition as a means towards distributing an anticipated
scarcity of CSBG dollars. I sense these meetings may result in potentially
opening a pathway towards dramatically reducing the network. I am not
comfortable with the back door method of introducing policies that I believe
may harm our network. I worry about not participating in these meetings, though,
but I am not sure of a benefit.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please remember our "House Rules." You must sign your post with name and state. No commercial, marketing, fundraising or partisan messages will be accepted. No offensive, derogatory or personally-damaging comments will be tolerated.